You haven't even read the thread. You don't know what you're responding to. You'...

harry8 · on Feb 5, 2015

It's a justification of putting someone on a terrorist list through an accusation of assault.

You put a lot of work into responding to these threads, I am asking why.

-- edit re-read the thread for a third time. What fnordfnordfnord has said is clearly entirely justified.

tptacek · on Feb 5, 2015

You found me out. It's a wonder it took so long. But you, Internet rando, you at last have discovered my shameful affiliation.

harry8 · on Feb 5, 2015

I read the thread.

fnordfnordfnord is clearly correct.

Justifying putting someone on a terrorist list by the accusation of an assault happening is just ridiculous, which is precisely what you did.

But you haven't answered why you spend so much time sprouting this kind of utter rubbish on all these threads. How many posts did you make on this topic alone?

What is your motive. You just want to spend hours defending the USG with obvious garbage like this out of patriotic duty? Is that it? What is it?

Keep on downvoting, it doesn't change the content.