Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Assault is assault. There's a law that covers it. It doesn't consider whether the victim is someone you like or not. It doesn't consider whether the perpetrator is someone you like or not. Secret terrorist lists are a genuine WTF for common assault which occurs and is dealt with many thousand times a week in the justice system.

Are you paid to advance such obvious crap? Are you posting against what you believe to try and stir up action? Are you trying to curry favour and get government contracts? It just doesn't make a lot of sense play the apologist so badly.



You haven't even read the thread. You don't know what you're responding to. You're just so angry that there are people that don't take your side in discussions that you'll accuse people of being shills, which says far more about you than it does about me.


It's a justification of putting someone on a terrorist list through an accusation of assault.

You put a lot of work into responding to these threads, I am asking why.

-- edit re-read the thread for a third time. What fnordfnordfnord has said is clearly entirely justified.


You found me out. It's a wonder it took so long. But you, Internet rando, you at last have discovered my shameful affiliation.


I read the thread.

fnordfnordfnord is clearly correct.

Justifying putting someone on a terrorist list by the accusation of an assault happening is just ridiculous, which is precisely what you did.

But you haven't answered why you spend so much time sprouting this kind of utter rubbish on all these threads. How many posts did you make on this topic alone?

What is your motive. You just want to spend hours defending the USG with obvious garbage like this out of patriotic duty? Is that it? What is it?

Keep on downvoting, it doesn't change the content.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: