Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're looking at it backwards.

Right now, people communicating on microblogging services end up having three things that need to be working for them to get through:

1. The µblog 2. The URL shortener 3. The original site

Various URL shorteners might fall over for a bit, or any other number of stupid things.

In the wordpress example, they registered wp.me so they could shorten the URLs sanely: http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2009/08/16/m...

If you support shortening, you reduce a dependency. You can still use tinyurl or bit.ly or whatever in this model, but if you don't, it'll be done for you.



Then why don't microblogging sites find a way to accomodate long URLs. Why do we have to start defining short (which is subjective) urls?


That's a fine suggestion, but it requires some out of band metadata.

Remember, twitter is an SMS mailing list. You want to be able to send that data in a way it can be picked up from simple mechanisms like SMS messages.


hmmm... I guess that's a good reason. But what other use is there besides SMS?


Phones have been able to recieve SMSes longer than 140 characters for about a decade now.

Limiting a service on the internet because 0.1% of the users want SMS notification on decade old phones is stupid and backwards.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: