Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Their influence was organic. Today's music trends are forced.

This is 100% purestrain revisionism.



Uh, I had to goog this...

but this doesnt map. So explain thyself ;;

" this involve a significant revision of fundamental Marxist theories and premises, and usually involve making an alliance with the bourgeois class "

-

uh... explain me... to me?


Your understanding of the music industry of the 60s and 70s is at the 'not even wrong' level.

Let's start with this to set the context: > But we dont have revolutionary music such as led zepplin, pink floyd, etc in the current crop.

And then when it comes to Led Zeppelin and this: > none of the above sought facade public images as much as every single 'influencing' pop-stars today.

I'm not sure what 'facade' is doing there, maybe you meant to use a different word, but I'm also not sure how you can look at Led Zeppelin after the early 70s and say they weren't seeking a public image.

Then there's Pink Floyd and this: > Their influence was organic. Today's music trends are forced.

From which I'm going to guess that you've never actually listened to the lyrics to 'Have a Cigar'.


im open to hearing ypour thoughts




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: