Your understanding of the music industry of the 60s and 70s is at the 'not even wrong' level.
Let's start with this to set the context:
> But we dont have revolutionary music such as led zepplin, pink floyd, etc in the current crop.
And then when it comes to Led Zeppelin and this:
> none of the above sought facade public images as much as every single 'influencing' pop-stars today.
I'm not sure what 'facade' is doing there, maybe you meant to use a different word, but I'm also not sure how you can look at Led Zeppelin after the early 70s and say they weren't seeking a public image.
Then there's Pink Floyd and this:
> Their influence was organic. Today's music trends are forced.
From which I'm going to guess that you've never actually listened to the lyrics to 'Have a Cigar'.
Let's start with this to set the context: > But we dont have revolutionary music such as led zepplin, pink floyd, etc in the current crop.
And then when it comes to Led Zeppelin and this: > none of the above sought facade public images as much as every single 'influencing' pop-stars today.
I'm not sure what 'facade' is doing there, maybe you meant to use a different word, but I'm also not sure how you can look at Led Zeppelin after the early 70s and say they weren't seeking a public image.
Then there's Pink Floyd and this: > Their influence was organic. Today's music trends are forced.
From which I'm going to guess that you've never actually listened to the lyrics to 'Have a Cigar'.