> That you can turn left without having to "go right".
Then you're wrong, and mixing handlebars into this is just you trying to obfuscate.
You claim that "Every article you'll find will point out that on a light vehicle like an bicycle you don't need to countersteer with the handlebars". I'm guessing you're regurgitating [0]. At least you looked it up like I suggested, respect. But it says that you don't need to countersteer with the handlebars because you can countersteer without the handlebars. You're still countersteering, as can be seen by the initial bump in the middle graph [1].
Anyway, like someone else said this is starting to look like YouTube comments.
Don't flatter yourself. I had read that article or another like it years ago.
> it says that you don't need to countersteer with the handlebars because you can countersteer without the handlebars.
You're right. I misunderstood, and I've learnt something - that explains why it was hard to lean over consciously. We'd've got here a lot sooner if you'd put half as much effort into engagement as you do into condescension.
Then you're wrong, and mixing handlebars into this is just you trying to obfuscate.
You claim that "Every article you'll find will point out that on a light vehicle like an bicycle you don't need to countersteer with the handlebars". I'm guessing you're regurgitating [0]. At least you looked it up like I suggested, respect. But it says that you don't need to countersteer with the handlebars because you can countersteer without the handlebars. You're still countersteering, as can be seen by the initial bump in the middle graph [1].
Anyway, like someone else said this is starting to look like YouTube comments.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countersteering#Countersteerin...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Countersteer_response.JPG