Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My objection isn't to the cuteness of the bot - it's to the waste of taxpayer's money. Could you really look an elderly taxpayer in the eye and tell them that building slackbots with their bottom dollar is a great idea without feeling a tinge of guilt?


Employees who are happy and feel included are going to produce better work (and a better return on the invested tax dollar) than those who aren't. I'd also expect second-order benefits such as helping us recruit from a wider, more diverse pool of applicants.

Of course there are boundaries to the happiness-increases-productivity dynamic, but quickly coding up a Slack bot seems well within the safe range.


> Employees who are happy and feel included are going to produce better work

Sure, but to what degree? Does the 'gained productivity' actually pay for the cost of maintaining 'happiness infrastructure'?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: