Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | shikon7's commentslogin

It seems to me that thinking models are harder to decensor, as they are trained to think whether to accept your request.

It goes both ways. E.g. unmodified thinking Qwen is actually easier to jailbreak to talk about things like Tiananmen by convincing it that it is unethical to refuse to do so.

I wonder if printed books were just as controversial when the printing press was invited.

But the article shows that the Nvidia ecosystem isn't that mature either on the DGX Spark with ARM64. I wonder if Nvidia is still ahead for such use cases, all things considered.


On the DGX Spark, yes. On ARM64, Nvidia has been shipping drivers for years now. The rest of the Linux ecosystem is going to be the problem, most distros and projects don't have anywhere near the incentive Nvidia does to treat ARM like a first-class citizen.


For full effect, it should be priced 100 in Switzerland and 139 in the US


139 CHF is 174$, you have the punishment right there.


With the tariff it should be $242.


Seems we're now at a point of time when OCR is doing so well, that printing text out and letting computers literally read it is suggested to be superior to processing the endoded text directly.


Neural networks have essentially solved perception. It doesn't matter what format your data comes in, as long as you have enough of it to learn the patterns.


The information density of a bitmap representation of text is just silly low compared to normal textual encodings, even compressed.


PDF is arguably a confusing format for LLMs to read.


But maybe your tells are also biased. If you're truly unbiased, then

* any facts supporting another view are by definiton biased, and should not be presented

* you have the only unbiased objective interpretation of the minds of the subjects

* you don't bias against using words just because they are hyperbolic

* something unbiased would inevitably be boring, so you need emotional appeal to make anyone care about it

* since no sources are unbiased, identifying any of them would inevitably lead to a bias


Google Glass was so much before its time, it might be reinvented a few more times and abandoned again before finally becoming a success.


The irony of calling selfies not realistic photographs until processed by AI


No, and I expect kernel developers to be much more careful not to break anything with Rust rewrites.


It might be a bit of bad publicity for those who want to rewrite as much as possible in Rust. While Rust is not to blame, it shows that just rewriting something in Rust doesn't magically make it better (as some Rust hype might suggest). Maybe Ubuntu was a bit too eager in adopting the Rust Coreutils, caring more about that hype than about stability.


> Rust is not to blame

Isn't that an unfalsifiable statement until the coreutils get written in another language and can be compared?


> Isn't that an unfalsifiable statement

Sounds pretty axiomatic: Rust is not to blame for someone else's choice to ship beta software?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: