Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | scosman's commentslogin

They made it, it didn't sell well. Last I checked zero Android manufacturers were still creating high quality small phones (<5.5"). The Android community has resorted to petitions like https://smallandroidphone.com

Some people definitely want it, but when not even one Android manufacturer will create a model when they can get 100% market share, it looks like there isn't enough demand.


You've hit the nail on the head. There are still some manufacturers that make small phones, and some that make high quality phones, but zero that make high quality small phones. Apple used to be our last respite, now we have nothing.

Foldable phones sold well enough Samsung introduced their 7th generation this year.

This feels so much like 90s Wikipedia criticism.

There are lousy and lazy ways to use LLMs. There are also enlightening and powerful ways. Find someone curious who will explore them. Don't date people who habitually fight anything new.


"Habitually fighting anything new" is nonpolitical conservatism. It's not my stance but it's a pretty valid one, long recognized. There is social value in having people and groups who reject all changes regardless of their apparent merit or sophistication. You can't trick or swindle them, they can't be fooled or persuaded. It provides a counter to the incentives pushing us to change too fast, or without understanding enough of the possible consequences of broad social/technological changes.

I think a lot of the problems we have now is an unbalance on this, an insufficiently strong conservative force. "Conservative" political movements stopped filling this role a couple generations ago in favor of a sort of radical revanchism. They want to change everything too, just in a different way.

People who fight every change will always lose. But they are still valuable to us.


Honestly I don't think that's a valid stance to have ("habitually fighting anything new", not your view), to reject anything new entirely based on habit or principle.

It means you don't have a reason for rejecting the thing in question. Just crossing your arms with scowl and pretending things were better in years of yore.

Having a reason why you think the thing is bad, and should not be accepted is the better position to have.


Yeah, it's a case of "don't let the perfect be the enemy of good". The conservative stance is happy with the status quo. The progressive stance isn't. We probably need a bit of both. Finding the right balance being key.

To put another way, contrarianism is a survival adaptation for humans.

There are some options that are clearly 99% superior than other options. But that 1% happens enough to create an extinction event for humanity if everyone relies on it.

People are going to oppose good ideas from their very core for no discernable rhyme or reason. But at the same time, it's not necessarily irrational - our genetics are hardcoded to hedge collectively in weird ways.


> People who fight every change will always lose. But they are still valuable to us.

Sure. But date the intellectually curious. They are way more fun.


> This feels so much like 90s Wikipedia criticism.

Wikipedia didn't start until 2001. There was no 90s Wikipedia criticism. It didn't exist.


And I hate it for that!

Don’t date people who abandon their own agency.

Weird how you let this news story pop up on your screen so indolently, instead of fetching your newspaper from the front porch. You’re abandoning your agency! /s

I don’t mean to say that we should outsource our thoughts to LLMs. In this case it’s clear that even if they had just searched “places for xyz” on maps, it would’ve been just as bad - what they wanted was effort, shopping around + research with pros, cons, and discussions, not just “not an LLM”. Valid criticism!


> Don't date people who habitually fight anything new.

Also, avoid dating people who assume that if you want to avoid the influence of genAI you "habitually fight anything new".


Awesome work

I let my TV on wifi, but block internet access at the router. Things like Airplay and Chromecast still work great, but no ads/tracking/etc.

Is that tied to the port or the MAC because the device can just change addresses and you won't know.

OpenWrt, make a wifi network only for those nasty spying devices, printers, tvs etc

You would know if your device starts updating. And if it changes mac to get around the block then it goes in the trash.

From what I recall of the original Karpathy definition, it’s only “vibe coding” if you aren’t reading the code it produces

Yes, I vote for keeping that definition and not throw it all into a box. LLM assisted coding is not vibe coding.

My point exactly, it is not vibe coding so it should not be called vibe coding. What should we call it then?

LLM-assisted Development. Something that for me works in practice, vibe-coding never did, you really need to carefully review and steer constantly if things are to work out longer than just a few features.

You’re right. It’s explicitly about not caring about the code:

> There's a new kind of coding I call "vibe coding", where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists. It's possible because the LLMs (e.g. Cursor Composer w Sonnet) are getting too good. Also I just talk to Composer with SuperWhisper so I barely even touch the keyboard. I ask for the dumbest things like "decrease the padding on the sidebar by half" because I'm too lazy to find it. I "Accept All" always, I don't read the diffs anymore. When I get error messages I just copy paste them in with no comment, usually that fixes it. The code grows beyond my usual comprehension, I'd have to really read through it for a while. Sometimes the LLMs can't fix a bug so I just work around it or ask for random changes until it goes away. It's not too bad for throwaway weekend projects, but still quite amusing. I'm building a project or webapp, but it's not really coding - I just see stuff, say stuff, run stuff, and copy paste stuff, and it mostly works.

https://x.com/karpathy/status/1886192184808149383


Cool, I did not know that. That makes perfect sense.

Mandatory != free/libre

Free/libre refers to user freedom. Mandatory licensing would restrict developer freedom in favor of user freedom, a common feature of consumer protection laws.

Freedom always comes at a cost.

Absolute freedom does not exist.

Etc.


I try this every decade. Love the first few months for speed. Then I end up paying the price later when I want to integrate "new OS feature X" or make a system gesture/style/animation feel native.

Lack of swipe for back on iOS is usually the easiest way to tell I'm looking at a web view.

But it's been about a decade so I'm due...


Swipe to go back can be implemented in frontend.

It's been a couple of years since I used it, but I think the Ionic framework has this feature.

https://ionicframework.com/


Lack of swipe back actually isn't an indicator. Apple doesn't even follow that pattern everywhere

I see some downvotes but you're correct. For example, in the App Store feature cards swipe left only bounces the card, you have to keep swiping to close. Swipe down closes it at once. It's not that far from the usual but has always felt strange to me. This same gesture won't close Home's new accessory card.

Isn't the App Store heavily webview based? Apple doesn't follow it but one of the complaints in this thread is that Apple has been overusing WebViews

Highly suggest trying Azure Trusted Signing on a CI system with windows boxes (I use Github). Windows signing was an expensive nightmare before, but is now relatively painless and down to $10/mo (which isn't cheap but is cheaper than the alternatives).

Azure Trusted Signing is a crapshoot. If you can get running, it's easy and fast and great. But if you run into any problems at all during the setup process (and you very well might since their onboarding process is held together with duct tape and twine), you're basically left for dead and unless you're on an enterprise support plan, you're not going to get any help from them at all.

Last time I checked it's still US/Canada only. Luckily I only needed code-signing for an internal app, so we just used our own PKI and pushed the certs over MDM.

It’s also limited to companies that have a proven life span of at least 3 years IIRC (you have to provide a duns number). They may have reopened for individuals, but that means your personal name attached to every binary.

Notarization is completely optional when building any OSS software on a Mac, and not part of any default build process I know. A Mac can sign builds for running locally, a process which is fast, completely local, and does require building test binaries or anything like that. Even a Mac building for an iPhone in developer mode has a local cert it can use, and doesn't require notarization.

Notarization is only needed when distributing binaries to others. Personally I do it once a month for the Mac app I distribute.


I suggest the SenseAir sensors. They don't seem as susceptible to fakes, and auto calibrate when exposed to fresh air. Supported by ESP home so build is simple.

Any evidence the Ikea sensor are actual CO2 censors and not just cheap "eCO2" sensors? Lots of the "CO2" censors our there are just cheap VOC censors with an calculation to estimate CO2.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: