Lovingly (and satirically) created by your friends at test double. Designed by Derek Briggs.

Edit: It seems to be (perhaps unintentionally) clickbait for programmers. We can't seem to resist visiting a website that claims to rate our code quality.

b=["Thoughtfulness of Names","Expressiveness of Tests","Empathy for Maintainers","Future-proof Avoidance","Conscientious Logging","Commit Message Clarity","Dependency Restraint","Release Strategy","Coherent Versioning","Convention Adherance","Pairing — Navigation","Pairing — Driving","Expectation Management","Googling for Answers","Respectful of Others"],n=function(){return _(b).chain().shuffle().first(5).value()},p=function(b){return _(a).include(b)?[96,98]:[0,40,60,70,80,85,90]},o=function(a){return null==a&&(a=[0]),_(a).chain().map(function(a){return _.random(a,100)}).sample().value()},c={59:"F",63:"D-",66:"D",69:"D+",73:"C-",76:"C",79:"C+",83:"B-",86:"B",89:"B+",93:"A-",96:"A",100:"A+"}

["pixeljanitor","bkeepers","tkaufman","searls","jasonkarns","andrewvida","theotherzach","bostonaholic","davemo","neall","kbaribeau","danthompson","crebma","dustintinney"]

Those guys all get an A+.

YHBT!

satire, clearly.

wether or not it's good satire is up for debate.

it tells me, after reviewing my code, and saying my non-existent tests are excellent.

I think I'll demur.

Edit: looking at the source, C+ is meant to be the grade, not the language, which makes more sense, even if this is just a fun farce.

EDIT: Ok, I'm starting to think this whole site is some kind of a joke.

I mean, Googling for Answers?!

> Lovingly (and satirically) created by your friends at...

proof that this is random

Next thing you know Buzzfeed will try to buy the site.

The talk's slides are up here: https://speakerdeck.com/searls/sometimes-a-controller-is-jus...

And video here (better versions coming soon): https://youtu.be/LdWMcs9EEOE?t=2h56m

Humorously I joked about it hitting HN during the talk, and then it actually did. We as developers can't resist something that'll quantify for us whether we're good at writing software, even when we know it's flawed.

Hint: If you type in a GitHub username that doesn't exist like "IBetThisUserDoesNotExist" you still get a grade :)

https://youtu.be/LdWMcs9EEOE?t=3h24s

(I can't seem to link accurately into the moving live stream)

Overall grade: C

Commit Message Clarity - F

Conscientious Logging - B+

Release Strategy - B-

Expressiveness of Tests - B+

Respectful of Others - D-

You should change the name of the website to something like : Are you a good contributer ?

edit : Oh it's a joke ? ha. ha. ha.

Torvalds:

Empathy for Maintainers: C-

Future-proof Avoidance: C-

Conscientious Logging: A+

Googling for Answers: B

Commit Message Clarity: B-

https://i.imgur.com/Lwu64Ms.jpg

[1]http://ismycodegood.com/#pixeljanitor