why is it not valid? these things are part of the libraries involved. as languages both Haskell and C++ are extremely free form to the point where you can abuse them into behaving like domain specific languages.
or do you mean the bit about it being less code and easier to read?
well done on catching the bug. :)
this is my own fault for being sloppy and not paying attention.
You (understandably, due to the double-negative) misread! I said it is not invalid. Which was really a weaselly way of saying that it's valid but I don't really agree with it – sorry about that!
or do you mean the bit about it being less code and easier to read?
well done on catching the bug. :)
this is my own fault for being sloppy and not paying attention.