Some great passages in there. This one could have been written today:
One of the peculiar phenomena of our time is the
renegade Liberal. Over and above the familiar Marxist
claim that 'bourgeois liberty' is an illusion, there is
now a widespread tendency to argue that one can only
defend democracy by totalitarian methods. If one loves
democracy, the argument runs, one must crush its enemies
by no matter what means. And who are its enemies? It
always appears that they are not only those who attack
it openly and consciously, but those who 'objectively'
endanger it by spreading mistaken doctrines. In other
words, defending democracy involves destroying all
independence of thought. This argument was used, for
instance, to justify the Russian purges. The most ardent
Russophile hardly believed that all of the victims were
guilty of all the things they were accused of. but by
holding heretical opinions they 'objectively' harmed the
régime, and therefore it was quite right not only to
massacre them but to discredit them by false
accusations. The same argument was used to justify the
quite conscious lying that went on in the leftwing press
about the Trotskyists and other Republican minorities in
the Spanish civil war. And it was used again as a reason
for yelping against habeas corpus when Mosley was
released in 1943.
These people don't see that if you encourage
totalitarian methods, the time may come when they will
be used against you instead of for you...
Indeed, there appears to be no reason to believe in objectivity and any claim to it should be viewed as highly suspect. Subjectivity is the best we can do.