Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's nothing "progressive" about eliminating nuclear energy. Especially when the goal is more electrical transportation, not less.


If we can replace nuclear with other clean sources, such as solar and wind, until the time that we can safely dispose of nuclear waste, then yes, I'd say that's progressive.


What about thorium and the liftr reactor? it uses 90%+ of its fuel.


Are those actually in production yet?

(Not trying to be snarky, just though those were still not really ready yet)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: