Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's my favorite part of that translation of the Tao Te Ching, too.

Additionally I find value in this rant from Erik Naggum: http://www.xach.com/naggum/articles/3141310154691952@naggum....

    like,
    if you aren't using today's fad language in the very latest version of
    the IDE, you'll be left behind.  aaaugh!  but it's good that some people
    run like they are scared out of their wits.  if they suddenly disappear
    over the edge of a cliff, a good number of people will notice in time and
    _not_ follow them.  those are the ones that matter.

    you can scare most people most of the time, but you can't scare all of
    the people all of the time -- some will always use Common Lisp.
The problem I face with accepting imperfection in general is twofold: 1) while I may not ever reach perfection, it's still a goal, because I find that I have flaws, and I can (and sometimes do) fix them, and life is better (plus after fixing I may then see new flaws to fix that I couldn't see before) and 2) when I'm forced to use a very imperfect tool for [business reason], when I know about this more perfect (not necessarily more shiny) tool over here but can't use because of [business reason]. In the second case, there are two states that are happier: actively using the better tool, or not knowing about the better tool in the first place. When you already know about the better tool, and can't soon get to the point of using it actively, the transition period can be demoralizing sometimes.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: