Because you don't understand their argument, they must be wrong, right?
And no I can't explain you their argument because whenever I do so I get downvoted.
The government wants their hands on all means of communication. The FCC basically shunned the public from using radio waves and TV waves. Now they're going to shun us away from the internet. The same organization, the FCC, will do this as they previously did with other means of communication, and you cheerleaders are being fooled and don't even know it. Not only that but you criticize those who see this for the fascism it is. It must be great to be ignorant because you can even attack those who read history and think you're coming out on top.
You're getting downvoted because you don't have an argument. All I see is rampant supposition and vitriol in your comment.
It is hard to understand an argument when none is presented. How is this fascism if the FCC has the power to do this already under existing law? How had the FCC "shunned the public from using radio waves and TV waves"? Keep in mind all countries manage radio transmissions because they have a vested interest in doing so. Shared mediums that everyone tries to use but cannot because of no management isn't much help. Think back to the LTE satellite internet company that had blocks right by satellite communication for GPS. You're saying its bad that we don't allow companies to run rampant over airwaves so that GPS no longer works? I hope not otherwise your argument is indeed shit and wrong.
Can you please explain this argument? Who cares if you get downvoted. I do not understand how a reasonable person who is not in cahoots with "big internet" can see this as a bad thing.
On the web anyone can make a website and get popular enough to compete with the big players.
Can you make an OTA TV channel (whatever the hell that is) that will get more viewers than Fox News?
I could give you examples of mom and pop websites that surpass big corp websites in views. Can you give me an example of a TV or Radio station that surpasses the big 3 (4? 5?) in views?
The answer is no. The reason is because OTA and amateur radio and television are a different stratum than "regular channels".
But online, all websites are in the same stratum. Until the FCC gets on it. I hope this clarifies my point.
And no I can't explain you their argument because whenever I do so I get downvoted.
The government wants their hands on all means of communication. The FCC basically shunned the public from using radio waves and TV waves. Now they're going to shun us away from the internet. The same organization, the FCC, will do this as they previously did with other means of communication, and you cheerleaders are being fooled and don't even know it. Not only that but you criticize those who see this for the fascism it is. It must be great to be ignorant because you can even attack those who read history and think you're coming out on top.