> "None of the K-series CPUs support VT-d. For some reason, VT-d and overclocking are not compatible."
No, compatible usually implies there's a technological or engineering justification. This is pure marketing. And the Devils Canyon update to Haswell introduced some -K parts that have VT-d.
Edit: And support likewise implies that even if it's not a purely technical issue, that there's at least some tradeoff. Enabling virtualization has a price to the consumer, but doesn't cost Intel anything extra.
No, compatible usually implies there's a technological or engineering justification. This is pure marketing. And the Devils Canyon update to Haswell introduced some -K parts that have VT-d.
Edit: And support likewise implies that even if it's not a purely technical issue, that there's at least some tradeoff. Enabling virtualization has a price to the consumer, but doesn't cost Intel anything extra.