Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd guess because contraception is seen as an alternative to pregnancy, and pregnancy doesn't incur significant medical costs or risks for the man. What would you be insuring against?

NB I'm a father, I know that having kids isn't entirely without health effects for men, but it's close enough for policy purposes.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: