Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
SaltStack's docs set the standard for software documentation (saltstack.com)
8 points by m1crofarmer on May 14, 2014 | hide | past | favorite | 7 comments


No, no they don't.

Poor search (custom Google searches are substandard generally), hidden full index, table of contents that doesn't match the index page, no synposes on pages that need them (eg CLI reference), no indication of what came before or next for individual sections, hidden index link, etc.

However, that's all very critical. On the plus side, comprehensive documentation is far better than no documentation at all, or poor / lacking documentation. And when you do want to read long sections of text, it looks quite well written.


We have a Salt Docs Sprint coming up next week. Details here: http://www.saltstack.com/saltstack-events/salt-docs-sprint Please add this feedback as an issue on our GitHub tagged with ticket #12446, and please join the sprint and contribute if you can.


As a frequent user of salt's docs I am quite impressed, but still more impressed by postgres :P --> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html


The getting started doesn't help to really start anything.

I had to use third party docs to start with salt and ansible. I don't like puppet and chef docs either. Maybe all of them expect some user knowledge (I'm a developer learning about configuration management).


Comprehensive? Yes

Easy to find what you are looking for? Not really


No, not especially. Poor search, pages in apparently random order. Quantity is good though.


Why?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: