I would suggest people to try to avoid the "regulation = 1% bailouts" equation.
It would be more useful to think of regulation for bitcoin actors more in the sense of required car insurance, or not being allowed to sell food with poisonous chemicals in it.
There can be a certain amount of regulation that helps avoiding incompetent or fraudolent actors even without a money-emitting FED or a socialize-losses-privatize-gains government.
It would be more useful to think of regulation for bitcoin actors more in the sense of required car insurance, or not being allowed to sell food with poisonous chemicals in it.
There can be a certain amount of regulation that helps avoiding incompetent or fraudolent actors even without a money-emitting FED or a socialize-losses-privatize-gains government.