>> The Linux kernel is much more complex and also brings down the whole system when it crashes
> Yeah. And there is nothing good about it.
I beg to differ, and I think a lot of people will disagree with you. Regardless, your snarky remark fails to state any problems with the Linux kernel, or identify what you consider a "good" kernel.
I think he meant there is nothing good about complexity and bringing down the whole system on a crash.
For the Linux kernel this is probably an unfortunate necessity, for an init system it is not.
Yeah. And there is nothing good about it.
> Sysvinit runs shell scripts and has known race conditions
Bugs can be everywhere. But the smaller the paramount part the better.
> You must also reboot to upgrade sysvinit
You don't