Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Claiming that something is "broscience" without evidence is even worse than broscience.


No. Science requires evidence; broscience includes everything else. (Unless you think broscience requires surpassing a popularity threshold; you can see this hits that by googling it.)

Edit: The burden of proof is in the original claim, rather than calling it broscience. They even crossed off the claim in the article.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: