Not me. Typically the last line I read in an article like that is the one that says "Page 1 of 6." I was curious to discover what happened to the $37 billion, but it was clear the author had other plans.
Sorry, I should've been clearer: I wasn't complaining about the pagination, I was complaining about the lack of anything resembling editing. You don't need six long pages to explain the presence of financial mismanagement at a large institution. It would be nice if I had the personal bandwidth to read that much text to get a simple summary of the issues, but I don't.
I found it interesting that my comment was modded down lower than another that questions the whole point behind Harvard's existence.
I actual appreciated the historical background, the information about the Management Company, the loose focus on the main issue, the commentary and evidence gathering.
It is a complicated situation with multiple reasons for the failure and with wide ranging repercussions, I paragraph wouldn't real do it.
If you want the executive summary then - Uni financial managers got rich, bailed, made greed based short term decisions which when recessions came wiped out most of the financial reserve; other managers locked up the rest in assets with poor liquidity.
I think many journalists are paid by the word. I'm not sure if this worse or better then programmers being paid based on number of bugs found and fixed.