You have correctly identified my position. Congratulations?

I assume there's a larger discussion about the challenge of disambiguating quora et al from neurological heuristics embedded in that observation.

More details, please.

I don't always cite "tl;dr". But when I do, it's in regards to over 300 pages of half-century-old metaphysical text.

But on a more serious note, is a more concise counter-argument available, one that takes the latest discoveries of neuroscience into account? And if I see any appeals to consequences in the explanation, I won't bother reading more of it.