He was apparently quite aware of *why* he was banned, based on the fact he had a... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Semiapies on June 9, 2009 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Google Bothered to Appeal a $761 Small Claims ... He was apparently quite aware of why he was banned, based on the fact he had an opening argument ready to go as to why that reason was unfair. Google should say why an account is canned, out of courtesy, but this guy was clearly trying to make extra money out of his domain squatting, something prohibited by the TOS.

lucumo on June 10, 2009 [–]

> Google should say why an account is canned, out of courtesy, but this guy was clearly trying to make extra money out of his domain squatting, something prohibited by the TOS.

I agree with both your points. I was only trying to make your first point.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact