TOS 1.0 Play nice, and have fun! TOS 1.1 Play nice (no links to shock sites), an... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		req2 on June 9, 2009 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Google Bothered to Appeal a $761 Small Claims ... TOS 1.0 Play nice, and have fun! TOS 1.1 Play nice (no links to shock sites), and have fun! TOS 1.2 Play nice (no links to shock sites, no embedded images of shock sites), and have fun! TOS 2.0 Play nice on our text only boards. Have fun! TOS 2.1 Play nice and do not try to evade the ASCII image filters. Have fun! TOS 3.0 <Insert 30 pages of legalese> Customer 3.0 "Aw, I hate when they jerk you around with 30 pages of legalese."

branden on June 9, 2009 [–]

Is that really worse than a service with a simple TOS that can be pulled for no specific reason? I'd prefer to have all the rules on the table, even if the result is a stack of legalese. At least then I know the nature of what I'm dealing with.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact