It's amusing how the troll-firm defines itself as non-profit. It must mean the firm doesn't accrue any value from its operations. If it takes a few bonuses for the partners to ensure that never happens, well that's okay!
It means they probably siphon the money off somewhere (shell companies, the companies that hire / enlist them, etc) so that they're only non-profit because their books balance out and because of the tax exemption status it gets them.
Can you elaborate on some of those issues? I've heard the unsubstantiated claim that the NYSE works on essentially that principle, and the much better-substantiated claim that that's what's going on with Morris Dees and the SPLC.
edit: stop impugning the SCLC; correctly impugn the SPLC.
As with most things, it depends on if you do it right or not. Do it right, and you're good. Make it too transparent what is going on, and you are going to get nailed.