Paul Graham is so good, good was defined as (+ Paul Graham good), and implemente...

wensing · on Sept 28, 2007

Except that + takes two arguments, not three--unless you've altered the definition.

yters · on Sept 28, 2007

Ok, here's a better one:

Chuck Norris wanted to be like Paul Graham, and tried to learn tail recursion. The best he could do was a roundhouse kick.

yters · on Sept 28, 2007

Aw cummon! I thought this was the ultimate cap - tail recursion? roundhouse kick? Chuck Norris? haha?

kf · on Sept 28, 2007

Paul Graham is always a single argument.

paulgb · on Sept 28, 2007

No, + takes any number of arguments.