Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I certainly wouldn't mind returning to a world where inexpensive, easily-labelled optical disks could hold relatively large amounts of data.

When HDDs were generally no more than a few gigabytes, I could basically stick a compressed backup of my PC on 1-2 CDs, write a date on them, and shove them in a box. It was incredibly convenient and offered good peace of mind. In fact, I just recently recovered some important data from the late 90s off one such CD.



You must take good care of your CDs, or they made better quality ones back in the 90s as most of them degrade after 10 years or less.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R#Lifespan


I've never seen a serious study on the subject (at least not in English), only anecdata, so I've never been sure how much veracity to assign to claims of the commonality of CD-R degradation. It wouldn't surprise me if 90s-era discs were higher quality, though -- for my own anecdata, I've had only one batch of CD-Rs ever show evidence of degradation, and it was one of the last I ever bought and seriously used in the early 2000s.

I've never seen a problem with DVD-Rs, but I didn't use nearly as many of those. I haven't written new optical disks for practically anything other than OS installation media since ~2003/2004, and in the last few years I've rarely even done that.

(And I never made the hop to BD-R. From a data storage perspective, I found it pretty much obsolete on arrival.)


My anecdote re. BD-R: I got the Verbatim "good" discs (made in Taiwan, good dye technology - sorry I forgot the specifics) a while ago and used them to backup data (that fortunately had backups to other places as well). Months later, tried to read them. No dice. I was shocked as I thought BD-R's were built more robustly than DVD+-R's. BTW, this is true of all 3 discs that I tried, albeit they came from the same 50-pack.


Indeed it would be wonderful, but exactly how viable this technique is remains to be seen.

Back when I started using CD burners a typical big hard drive was far smaller than a single CD. (A CD burner was usually hooked up to a dedicated Mac -- always a Mac -- with an unusually large and expensive external hard drive.) If this technology becomes available within, say, five years, it should still be far further ahead of our 4TB SSDs for a good 12 years (assuming Moore's Law in both cases, which is probably optimistic for SSDs). For comparison, CD-Rs probably stopped being useful for backups about fifteen years after I started using them in 1992 (by 2007 it would be a one large or a few small projects on one CD).


It would be interesting to see how difficult it would be to have micro-cd drives, where a disc had a housing, just like an old floppy; but about the sized of an SD card... Super cheap, super dense, and ideally protected better than current CDs...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: