> I believe it's unlikely that "not even close" is at all accurate.
Especially since the opening argument of the author is that AngularJS is gaining momentum because "it is simpler".
My personal experience is that when I ported my application from Ember to Angular, my code base (~5,000 lines) get simplified considerably. Based on what I've been reading, I'm not the only one making these observations.
My main beef with Ember was not about complexity or simplicity, just that it's not as powerful as AngularJS and it also covers only a small part of what AngularJS gives me out of the box (especially server side includes).
Especially since the opening argument of the author is that AngularJS is gaining momentum because "it is simpler".
My personal experience is that when I ported my application from Ember to Angular, my code base (~5,000 lines) get simplified considerably. Based on what I've been reading, I'm not the only one making these observations.
My main beef with Ember was not about complexity or simplicity, just that it's not as powerful as AngularJS and it also covers only a small part of what AngularJS gives me out of the box (especially server side includes).