Ok, so you were talking about cash vs non-cash, instead of solely threshhold amounts, as initially appeared to be the case. We get that. But, it doesn't matter. Again, you are missing the point about EXPANDED GOVERNMENT CAPABILITIES, irrespective of whether this one point about threshholds is about cash vs. non-cash. The article itself is about far more than just what's reportable. It is about things like broader access for sifting data, which also catches up innocent citizens, and under liberal retention policies.
You seem to be getting stuck. This is why you need to re-read the article instead of demanding that others do the same. And this is why you have failed to respond to my previous post, which clearly demonstrates that you have no idea what you're talking about.
You're just angry and making meaningless, half-baked points. Why are you so pissed anyway?
And, do I need to drop f-bombs to help you understand the article/discussion here?
Or maybe you should start over from the top:
Step 1: Read the article (for comprehension this time)...
Step 2: Form a relevant conclusion...
Ok, so you were talking about cash vs non-cash, instead of solely threshhold amounts, as initially appeared to be the case. We get that. But, it doesn't matter. Again, you are missing the point about EXPANDED GOVERNMENT CAPABILITIES, irrespective of whether this one point about threshholds is about cash vs. non-cash. The article itself is about far more than just what's reportable. It is about things like broader access for sifting data, which also catches up innocent citizens, and under liberal retention policies.
You seem to be getting stuck. This is why you need to re-read the article instead of demanding that others do the same. And this is why you have failed to respond to my previous post, which clearly demonstrates that you have no idea what you're talking about.
You're just angry and making meaningless, half-baked points. Why are you so pissed anyway?
And, do I need to drop f-bombs to help you understand the article/discussion here?
Or maybe you should start over from the top:
Step 1: Read the article (for comprehension this time)... Step 2: Form a relevant conclusion...