1. I think you are projecting a bit here. You come off as slightly crazed.
2. I never claimed it was cheap, i objected to acting like this technology is new. It's quite widely used in the enterprise world.
3. The cache model has the drives on two different connections as well. See Intel's Rapid Storage Technology.
4. I think i refuted the idea that the sum of the two drives capacity is useful in the current market (it's slower and not cheaper enough).
5. I'm all for different or unusual. I object to them choosing a marketing buzzword and pretending they've come up with some heretofore unthought of technology. I think I made that clear when I objected to calling it pioneering or new technology.
2. I never claimed it was cheap, i objected to acting like this technology is new. It's quite widely used in the enterprise world.
3. The cache model has the drives on two different connections as well. See Intel's Rapid Storage Technology.
4. I think i refuted the idea that the sum of the two drives capacity is useful in the current market (it's slower and not cheaper enough).
5. I'm all for different or unusual. I object to them choosing a marketing buzzword and pretending they've come up with some heretofore unthought of technology. I think I made that clear when I objected to calling it pioneering or new technology.