There's a lazy habit from some folks to say something they either disagree with or don't understand was "written by AI" without backing up that statement.
I don’t think it’s AI. AI would at least keep the article body consistent with the title even if it had to bend over backward and hallucinate new facts.
>>There's a lazy habit from some folks to say something they either disagree with or don't understand was "written by AI" without backing up that statement.
Thank you for saying this, I keep arguing the same. "This is llm" has become lazy for "I dont like this so I will pretend its llm"
People usually make the determination by reading at least part of the text and then find multiple smoking guns / llm-isms
The comment you responded to did not have those.
Fwiw, the article we're commenting on was likely not LLM written. The sentence structure is too convoluted, no LLM would've generated it like that - unless very carefully prompted ... But at that point it's no longer pure AI slop (imo).
