> I've tried using qwen and deepseek but they can't even output documents
What agent harness did you use? Usually, "write_file", "shell_exec" or similar is two of the first tools you add to an agent harness, after read_file/list_files. If it doesn't have those tools, unsure if you could even call it a agent harness in the first place.
Sorry for the confusion, I was actually talking about their Web based chat. Since most of my work is governance and docs, I just use their Web chats and they just refuse to output proper documents like Claude or Chatgpt do.
Aha... Well, I let Codex (Claude Code would work too) manage/troubleshoot .xlsx files too, seems to handle it just fine (it tends to un-archive them and browse the resulting XML files without issues), seen it do similar stuff for .app and .docx files too so maybe give that a try with other harnesses/models too, they might get it :)
Yeah, fine... but it's like daily that a non-tech-savvy friend of mine tells me they just installed some shiny "harness" on their laptop now to organize their emails, and they "just put it in one folder" and "8n8 says", what does it say on the tin, Dave? "it says it's highly unlikely it will escape from the folder". Your work computer? "Yeah, but it's a real company. They're all about security."
So telling someone who just wants to upload an .xlsx file to a bot that they should just find a harness to give CLI access to their work computer - right after they say they work in a regulatory capacity - is just freakin malpractice.
What agent harness did you use? Usually, "write_file", "shell_exec" or similar is two of the first tools you add to an agent harness, after read_file/list_files. If it doesn't have those tools, unsure if you could even call it a agent harness in the first place.