given that we don't have a king (trump would be a dictator if you thought he had absolute control over things, i don't think he has much control over things) and most people are upset about the war, it seems to me that this is misdirection to muddy the anti-war consensus in the US by attaching divisive political issues and inflammatory language to it.
divide & conquer, in my democracy? It's more likely thank you think!
The main divide and conquer I see are my fellow countrymen still transfixed by the con artist's cult of personality, thinking that all of this must be 17-d chess with some underlying goal that might end up benefiting them.
Unilaterally starting an elective illegal war (for which there is no win condition) goes to the exact point of "no kings" [autocratic authoritarian strongmen]. Even the traditional US military intelligence agencies thought attacking Iran was a poor idea, and that's saying something!
As for the name, I've certainly got my own qualms with it. But I'm not going to let that distract me from supporting the organization we do have.
divide & conquer, in my democracy? It's more likely thank you think!