Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Like I said, I think your position is defensible but I think it falls short so I still disagree. If the people who bought into this contract can get it in front of a judge though, the judge might agree with you.

I am prepared to be wrong on this one, but I just don’t think that Trump & Rubio’s words after the fact are enough.



Actually, the way the bet is worded a truthful statement on intent in 2050 could change the outcome of the bet retroactively.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: