The problem isn't that I didn't read the article. The problem is that I did. The author should have been renamed Captain Obvious.
> That 90 item list was near universally praised.
I wasn't the only one to point out that it had 80 points too many, or words to that effect.
> Not everything can be explained so succinctly. Books exist for a reason.
But it wasn't a book, it was an online article.
> But that is a skill that is easily honed by an afternoon of thought... no need to be so dismissive.
My post wasn't dismissive, it was critical, and the criticism was legitimate.
The problem isn't that I didn't read the article. The problem is that I did. The author should have been renamed Captain Obvious.
> That 90 item list was near universally praised.
I wasn't the only one to point out that it had 80 points too many, or words to that effect.
> Not everything can be explained so succinctly. Books exist for a reason.
But it wasn't a book, it was an online article.
> But that is a skill that is easily honed by an afternoon of thought... no need to be so dismissive.
My post wasn't dismissive, it was critical, and the criticism was legitimate.