Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ok, let’s not have the is Bluesky decentralised discussion again. Kudos to Bluesky’s PR efforts to use complex technology to basically sell themselves as whatever people want to hear (like NFTs but social media). There are a number of X/Threads clones out there, but I’d take a group chat on some relatively secure messaging platform over “social media” any day. Even better if it’s something I can self host or join into one from many servers (remember IRC? Good times).

We really need to rethink this “one corp owns all the keys and all servers” setup.



I’m just glad we didn’t have the conversation again


  > Even better if it’s something I can self host or join into one from many servers (remember IRC? Good times).
What's stopping you? Even threads can connect to BlueSky


> Even threads can connect to BlueSky

I thought Threads only interoperates with Mastodon/the fediverse in some limited capacity. Did I miss some Bluesky integration announcement?


You just need a bridge, as with connecting any decentralized platforms

https://fed.brid.gy/


That's opt-in, mangles usernames, and on top of that quite a few people on Mastodon seemed allergic to the very idea of bridging/federation the last time I looked into it.


  > That's opt-in
So? It's just an example. I'm sure you could do it in a cleaner way. They use different protocols. If you can run your own server and connect with open source tools, it's decentralized. Though of course that doesn't mean a decentralized protocol isn't highly centralized. See email


so matrix? (which has it's own issues, but will hopefully overcome them eventually)


Yup

> highlights the risks associated with the centralization of instant messaging services

Any cervices, really




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: