No, the evidence is an Italian writer who did years of research, including a Bosnian former intelligence officer as a key source. He also uncovered that Bosnian intelligence warned the Italian secret service that this was happening.
There are also specific individuals whose details have been sent to SISMI for investigation.
>No, the evidence is an Italian writer who did years of research, including a Bosnian former intelligence officer as a key source
I can't read the article, but none of this really contradicts OP's point, which is that all of this hinges on hearsay. Is there any evidence presented that isn't hearsay?
I mean serb snipers were already shooting the civilians en masse in Sarajevo. Its not a huge leap from that to lending the opportunity to a few depraved rich idiots. The Epstein files absolutely show you how depraved some rich folks are...
Doesn't this logic just cause a cascade? eg. "we all know group X is depraved, so it wouldn't surprise me that they did something even more depraved, which lends further evidence for them being depraved!"
Well yeah, I am sure he hanged himself (or was hanged, depending on what really is the truth) because all those folks were visiting his island for drinks and laughs, we'll just disregard the testimonies of the abused girls, shall we?
I was only talking about the files that congress refuses to release. Everything you mentioned is unrelated to the files I was replying to, and nothing in what I said suggests that "nothing happened".
There were snipers on all sides doing immoral things. The war in Sarajevo started when a Serbian wedding was shot up in April 1992, causing the Serbs to panic and want to secede from Bosnia & Herzegovina. Then you end up with "rights for this ethnic group but not the other", and a civil war breaks out with geopolitical meddling from foreign wanna-be powers.
No please, stop puking this bullshit...if you believe that, you also believe Princip's assasination of Duke Ferdinand was the underlying cause of WW1 (and not the tensions among the great colonial powers of the time).
There were many war crimes in Sarajevo, but this one is probably fake. The only evidence for this is some shady testimonies, and it was not backed up in post war testimony of soldiers, flight logs, etc., even though many other war crimes were.
Maybe get yourself acquainted with a topic before you throw up something like this. For reference here is a video of renowned russian poet Eduard Limonow, shooting at Sarajevo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkjPZvz27mg . I guess this video and the "little" fact that the Italian state prosecutor would not just open an investigation based on some hear/say should make it a bit more believable, shouldn't it?
Interesting video. "Poet" shooting at a city with another "poet" Karadzic. Curious that they speak English, wasn't Russian taught at schools in Yugoslavia? And Karadzic's command post being a cable car.
Limonov was here for ideological reasons. All sides had foreigners in their ranks of various motivations, from the mercenary and the adventurer to the strongly ideologically motivated. What is missing is evidence of people coming there for pure entertainment and paying for the privilege...
I have personally known an individual here in Ukraine who wanted to go for a human safari in Eastern Ukraine in the heyday of the previous war with russia, closer to 2014.
All it takes is a mix of morbid curiosity, a bit of boredom, lots of money and a prominent antisocial personality disorder.
After the mass graves hoax in Canada, it’s hard to take these stories designed for outrage and ad revenue seriously without more evidence than what is being presented.
>As of April 2025, no bodies have been exhumed from the suspected gravesites, largely due to a lack of community consensus on whether to investigate detected anomalies at the risk of disturbing burials.[9] As of January 2024, at least three official excavations had been performed with no bodies discovered, though at least one excavation only investigated a portion of the reported ground anomalies at that site.[10][11][12] Disputes regarding the conclusiveness of the evidence has helped spawn a movement of denialism about the existence of some or all residential school burial sites.[9][13][14] Indigenous groups and academics have dismissed claims of a "mass grave hoax", saying that claimed discoveries of mass graves were present in a minority of stories published by mainstream media and that there had been public misinterpretation of what had actually been announced in 2021.[15
It sounds like the "mass" part of the "mass graves" is disputed, and there's motte-and-bailey on both sides (eg. "you must think nobody/bazillion died in residential schools") muddying the dispute.
It wasn't exactly a "hoax" though, more like sensationalized reporting. Like "so-and-so identified a site where we believe there could be bodies buried" turned into "mass grave uncovered"
Some potential burial sites were investigated, no bodies were found. Unmarked graves in association with residential schools certainly have been found in Canada, and since proving a negative in regards to these claims is untenable, the media is generally reluctant to say "see, there were no mass graves after all"
Where have unmarked residential school graves been found? Also investigating other supposed grave sites have been disallowed by their respective tribes
>[Quillette] has been described as libertarian-leaning;[2][3][4] the Columbia Journalism Review called Quillette "the right wing's highly influential answer to Slate",[5] and it has been criticized as an "anti-PC soapbox"[6] and for being "reflexively contrarian".[7]
People who were skeptical at The Fraser Institute are probably also skeptical of Quillette
There seem to be clear admission of war crime, that looks like prime indictment material by the ICC, which could make traveling not so cosy in the future.
You've a gripe with outrage and yet... I mean, any think tank can write anything they think and post it to the interwebs. Here's the other side's perspective:
Since the confirmation of community knowledge of suspected unmarked graves in Kamloops, First Nations across Canada have located evidence of the remains of more than 2,300 children in suspected unmarked graves at or near former residential schools and Indian hospitals, according to the report.
But the unauthorized visits to the site are the work of a "core group" of Canadians who continue to deny, defend or minimize the physical, sexual, psychological and emotional abuse inflicted on Indigenous children in the Indian Residential School System "despite the indisputable evidence of survivors and their families," Murray said at a Friday news conference. Denialism and disrespect exacerbate the pain and trauma of survivors and community members trying to grieve and search the grave sites. "Denialism is violence. Denialism is calculated. Denialism is harmful. Denialism is hate," Murray said.
So there is no actual evidence, and you're committing a hate crime if you ask to see evidence or point out that there's no evidence.
If a white person has a drunk uncle or crazy aunt tell a wild conspiracy theory at a family gathering, people dismiss them as a kook. But if an indigenous person does the same thing, it's supposed to be treated as sacred cultural knowledge being passed down?
I have an uncle who swears there are thousands of people who've been killed by Bill and Hillary Clinton. He has lists and websites and links to obituaries about deaths "deemed suicides" or "not investigated" or "unsolved". I don't think that my skepticism about his claims is violence or hate.
> I don't think that my skepticism about his claims is violence or hate.
You realise the investigations are on-going after the initial community-led assessments done with remote sensing tech like GPRs (ground penetrating radars)? This is where this denialism takes an ugly turn.
> If a white person has a drunk uncle or crazy aunt tell a wild conspiracy theory at a family gathering, people dismiss them as a kook.
I mean, new Holocaust mass graves are still being discovered as institutions keep their investigations up using GPRs! You deny those graves, too? Sure Holocaust denialism is filled with "kooks" unto itself, but surely, we're not those kooks? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327194663_Holocaust...
If you ignore HACKER in “Hacker news - news that matter” sure. But I learned to read in school, and can comprehend the context formed from the last 5 words. Heck even GPT can do that!
BTW autism is a disorder, using that the way you do, as some kind of insult is disrespectful and disgusting.
Yeah I am sorry for misusing the word "autistic" here. it was done without thinking, but it still does not make it right and I apologise to any people with such a disorder reading this. I should have said something along the lines of "world-ignorant nerds" or something to that effect. I guess I was a bit irritated by people being pedantic about classifying the topics when the topic is a literal human safari. That is a sort of thing that should interest us all, hacker or no hacker, it kinda transcends the little bubbles we wrap around our daily lives.
That does not answer the question: how is that relevant in this forum?
I do not want the world to exist to any whim. I just made a remark, with a personal opinion. Sorry to see, such is not welcome here, but mere political news which have absolutely nothing to do with hackers, computers, technology or science are very well received.
And BTW, I was bot so wrong, it got flagged. So there is that for your whim.
If there is a suspicion of such a high crime, that SHOULD BE relevant in any forum. It is not simply a matter of being or not being interested in the latest LLM fads or sqlite optimisations or whatever. It is what is called a universally relevant topic. You know, rich people hunting down a besieged population?
But this does remind me of that excellent docu-series The Line about members of a Navy SEAL platoon who accused their chief of war crimes.
https://tv.apple.com/us/show/the-line/umc.cmc.4u53f7zokr7g40...
reply