Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why thge f*k did people pay for a fortune and a subscription on top of that for these pieces of junk?

What were they thinking, what was it gonna do, a single thermostat by itself? For this kind of money, they could've invested in actual energy efficiency improvements for their homes, not a device that allows Big tech to spy on them.





1. There is no subscription.

2. I paid less than $200 for it.

3. The device lets me control the thermostat remotely. I can turn on the heater when coming home from a trip, or turn it off if I forgot when I left.

4. I can just say "Hey Google, turn up the heat" out loud.

I don't care if Google knows about the temperature of my home. I absolutely would buy the product again.


Nest before Google (Nest Gen 1 and 2) was a small tech startup.

That doesn't really make it better, unless they had a stricter privacy policy.


Oh LOL

Please don't fulminate on HN. You can make these points without the rage; the guidelines require that if we're going to participate here. They also ask us to avoid generic tangents. This post is about an open-source firmware to run on devices, not people's motivation to buy the devices in the first place.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


Where did you get the idea there was a subscription?



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: