Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For one, alcohol tax is applied at point of sale, so there is a friction on consumption. Gambling taxes are applied as though gambling is an investment activity and losses can even be justified. Second, most recent studies that look at the question classify gambling as more dangerous and addictive. There is much more of a path from gambling to suicide.


>alcohol tax is applied at point of sale, so there is a friction on consumption. Gambling taxes are applied as though gambling is an investment activity and losses can even be justified.

Not sure what this means. Why can't gambling taxes just be applied at point of sale to create friction?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: