Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So why are your arbitrary yard sticks more valid than someone elses?

Probable the biggest problem as others have stated is that we can’t really define intelligence more precisely than that it is something most humans have and all rocks don’t. So how could any definition for AGI be any more precise?



Where did I say my yardsticks are better? I don’t even think I set out any of mine

I said having to satisfy “all” the yard sticks is stupid, because one could conceive a truly infinite number of arbitrary yard sticks.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: