> I'm going to go into my own perspective of it; it is not reflective of what it discusses
Why not answer the question?
And looking at your paragraphs I'm still not sure I see a definition of intelligence. Unless you just mean that intelligence is something that can approximate this algorithm?
One way you can define intelligence considered functionally is how an entity given patterned input can demonstrate that it learns and understands that pattern by responding with an extension of that pattern. This definition defines what an ideally intelligent entity is if we use this functional definition.
Why not answer the question?
And looking at your paragraphs I'm still not sure I see a definition of intelligence. Unless you just mean that intelligence is something that can approximate this algorithm?