> At the time of initial reporting, it was speculated that DJI might have secured the necessary permits. However, since the video was removed, it’s a safe bet that this isn’t true, or at least DJI itself is uncertain if it’s true.
> However, since the video was removed, it’s a safe bet that this isn’t true
Maybe, maybe not. Is the value of the video worth the negative buzz? They could post a permit on their site homepage and it's still going to do damage.
I am really unsure what is the root cause of this controversy.
Restricted space needs permits -> you get permits -> you shoot beautiful landscape … controversy
Some people dislike inconsiderate drone users, or just drones in general -> they see video shot in restricted space -> they assume it was made without permit and in the most damaging way possible -> they make a lot of noise about this perceived slight
Or, they simply think that the permit should not be given in the first place, because the use does not actually full fill the "very rare, special circumstances" .
It's a hassle to get permits to shoot anything in Canadian national parks and they'll ride your ass if they find unpermitted footage of their park being used in a commercial context.
The rock climber Adam Ondra climbed the Dawn Wall in Yosemite and is sitting on an epic rock climbing documentary about it that he cannot release because his team failed to secure the necessary permits.
Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45572640