Yes you understand now. Every time you understand, you move the goal posts. You've moved them twice now, this time simply declaring the speech you don't like "isn't yours." At first it was about offenses that cause harm, then it was essentially about contract law. And then when you found out there was no contract, then you just moved the goal posts to the patient owning the information inside the provider's brain.

There is no curiosity in your approach, you know in your heart of hearts you're simply backtracking and then shifting the posts everytime your claims are wrong.

I was certainly thinking about things more. Part of a normal discussion is people try to be clearer with their thinking as they discuss something.

And clarifying can be either or both tuning reasoning or tuning communication.

You realize you can nit pic at almost any comment with some validity?

And you didn’t include any of your own substantive thoughts, which I apparently moved closer to, until your second comment after I asked you for them?

So what to do? Just communicate in a positive and clear way yourself if you have something to add.

I come here to learn. I would rather learn from you than wonder why you make negative comments, in a discussion where you and your thoughts are welcome.