Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If I might be more optimistic, I think people may actually care about a statement being rooted in reality, but people may not be likely to slow down and engage in suspicion of something they would not expect to be false. (Though the size of that window may be its own problem!) If I see someone claiming they have the cure for cancer, then I consider it a bit fantastical and want to investigate further. If a supposed quote from an older actress talks about her time doing Shakespeare, then it doesn’t really proc any doubt in me; I’m offering a baseline of trust to the publisher that forwarded that information along to me that this information is factual and not someone’s strange fanfiction about her life. I can appreciate that the author doubted it because a quick scroll of the blog shows that he’s got an interest in stagecraft and so it bumped up against his expertise, but I don’t think that I would have seen the quote myself and done the same… maybe I am one of those sub-median ignoramuses you mention. I agree that people uncritically eating up sensational news is a problem, but this is like, pretty straightforward in-memoriam news that I’d hope to not have to doubt.


> I think people may actually care about a statement being rooted in reality

People say they do

However if asked, the vast majority wouldn’t have any ability to tell you how they would measure reality

Most people still believe in gods so you’re already working in a completely different concept of “real” and “reality.”




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: