Straight up FP is lying, so you’re off to a fucking awful start. You can verify this against the News Agent interview I’ve mentioned for the third time now. Watch it on YouTube.

I don’t have an Economist account but it doesn’t seem to mention coverup in be lede. Given it would be the biggest political story in Britain, I doubt it says coverup by politicians.

Al Jazeera talks about the inquiry being ordered, still no coverup.

Guardian talks about the disgustingly bad reporting standards of the police. Still no coverup by politicians.

Sky News is a timeline of inquiries. Literal opposite of a fucking coverup.

Telegraph is talking about the inquiry that Labour eventually launched. It’s lying about the use of the term coverup: no abuse was covered up by politicians by running, or not, an inquiry.

The Week is an explainer for the scandal, no coverup by politicians.

Women Against Rape are talking about the police, not politicians. Anyone knows, and I already mentioned, the failures of the police here.

Did you seriously just waste your time finding links you obviously didn’t read to still fail to answer a simple fucking question:

Where is the evidence that POLITICIANS covered up child abuse rings? That was the flagged comment and you have failed to back the claim.