lol I added 'trump', 'republican', and 'democrat' as custom filter keywords and ...

insane_dreamer · 2025-09-30T16:27:37 1759249657

It’s probably hard to find an article these days that doesn’t mention one of those words (except maybe celebrity gossip). The world we live in.

BeetleB · 2025-09-30T19:15:56 1759259756

In other words, this is exposing a long standing flaw in journalism. I know things are super polarized now, but even 20 years ago, when mentioning a Congressperson regarding a particular social problem, they would specify if he was a Democrat/Republican.

I really don't need to know which party he is part of. If the article was about a party's stance, it makes sense - but the article is about one politician.

1_1xdev1 · 2025-09-30T21:08:25 1759266505

Sure you do, to understand actual patterns in actions of members of the party.

And ignoring that, it’s general context. Part of the job of a journalist.

BeetleB · 2025-09-30T21:45:26 1759268726

> to understand actual patterns in actions of members of the party.

Or to construct patterns that don't reflect reality.

Should we also list their ages, ethnicity, religious affiliation(s) in each article mentioning a Congressperson and construct those patterns as well?

Sorry, I'd like to think on my own.

ajam1507 · 2025-09-30T23:49:44 1759276184

When every vote on a bill lands along party lines you might want to begin to suspect that party affiliation matters quite a bit.

BeetleB · 2025-10-01T03:43:54 1759290234

> I know things are super polarized now, but even 20 years ago, when mentioning a Congressperson regarding a particular social problem, they would specify if he was a Democrat/Republican.

When articles always mention party affiliation, people will judge the politician's behavior based on the affiliation, and not on his actions.

CGMthrowaway · 2025-09-30T23:27:50 1759274870

I checked a few news websites and the only one I could find that did a halfway decent job of this was USA Today: https://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/