What was divisive were the attacks and mockery of Kirk, not the man himself.
I noticed that Comedy Central has now pulled their "Charlie Kirk" episode.
The link I gave was just direct quotes with attribution. The publication's bias was just in choosing to write that article at all.
Also please skip the "there is much to question" nonsense. The conspiracy theorists had dozens of days in court and ended up with losses, fines, dismissal, and jail time because they couldn't provide proof.
It would also be very strange for people to partially steal an election, allowing their opponents to take statewide offices in states like Georgia where the vote split between parties.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/media-matters/
There is much to question about the 2020 election, and much of the evidence is now gone.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1742670648433090764.html
What was divisive were the attacks and mockery of Kirk, not the man himself. I noticed that Comedy Central has now pulled their "Charlie Kirk" episode.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/entertainment/television/202...