>The second amendment literally defines a free state by its capacity for armed revolt
Aren't you confusing the text[1] with what one person, namely Thomas Jefferson, said about it?
[1] "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Aren't you confusing the text[1] with what one person, namely Thomas Jefferson, said about it?
[1] "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."