Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've often gotten the sense that fly.io is not completely averse to some degree of "cowboying," meaning you should probably take heed to this particular advice coming from them..


I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about but nobody is running Claude Code on our server fleet here.


You took it wrong. I'm with you here.


We're pretty averse to "cowboying". We're a small team working on an enormously ambitious problem at a much earlier point on the maturity curve than incumbents. It's fine if that maturity concern impacts people's take on the product, but not at all fine if people use it as a reflection on the people and processes building that product.


I think I just meant perhaps fly isn't afraid of responsibly "moving fast" in certain situations. Sorry for any offense, didn't mean it like that at all and there was no ill intent (actually the opposite) in my OC. At the end of the day I was trying to convey that the security stances of fly should be paid attention to.


Sorry, I was pretty knee-jerk here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: